CSAP

=CSAP= //Colorado Student Assessment Program// The following is data collected about the third grade from the [|2010 Annual Report to the Legislature]

Some of these tables have been modified; highlighting has been done to show the categories which the students in this case study fall under. Because CSAP testing begins in the third grade, neither student A nor B have taken the actual CSAP exam, rather they are preparing to take it in February 2012. Student C is in the fourth grade and therefore not taken into consideration here, since these results pertain to third grade.

__key:__ Yellow highlight = all students in our school Pink hightlight = Student A Blue hightlight = Student B

2010 Grade 3 Reading Statewide Data ||
 * Table 1A(1) Grade 3 Reading Statewide Results
 * Grade || Category || Total || # Unsat || % Unsat || # Part Prof || % Part Prof || # Prof || % Prof || # Adv || % Adv || % Prof & Adv || # No Scr || % No Scr ||
 * 3 || State: COLORADO || 61095 || 6940 || 11 || 11284 || 18 || 38898 || 64 || 3762 || 6 || 70 || 211 || 0 ||
 * DISTRICT SIZE ||
 * 3 || 300 or less || 617 || 53 || 9 || 106 || 17 || 423 || 69 || 32 || 5 || 74 || 3 || 0 ||
 * 3 || 301 - 600 || 1562 || 115 || 7 || 282 || 18 || 1074 || 69 || 83 || 5 || 74 || 8 || 1 ||
 * 3 || 601 - 1200 || 1462 || 148 || 10 || 317 || 22 || 928 || 63 || 62 || 4 || 68 || 7 || 0 ||
 * 3 || 1201 - 6000 || 12194 || 1188 || 10 || 2375 || 19 || 7970 || 65 || 618 || 5 || 70 || 43 || 0 ||
 * 3 || 6001 - 25000 || 19593 || 1739 || 9 || 3309 || 17 || 13169 || 67 || 1338 || 7 || 74 || 38 || 0 ||
 * 3 || 25001 or more || 25667 || 3697 || 14 || 4895 || 19 || 15334 || 60 || 1629 || 6 || 66 || 112 || 0 ||
 * GENDER ||
 * 3 || Female || 30114 || 2776 || 9 || 5261 || 17 || 19730 || 66 || 2246 || 7 || 73 || 101 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Male || 30978 || 4163 || 13 || 6023 || 19 || 19167 || 62 || 1516 || 5 || 67 || 109 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Data invalid or not provided || 3 || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * ETHNICITY ||
 * 3 || American Indian/Alaska Native || 720 || 103 || 14 || 198 || 28 || 396 || 55 || 19 || 3 || 58 || 4 || 1 ||
 * 3 || Asian/Pacific Islander || 2450 || 209 || 9 || 336 || 14 || 1643 || 67 || 249 || 10 || 77 || 13 || 1 ||
 * 3 || Black (not Hispanic) || 3621 || 703 || 19 || 902 || 25 || 1934 || 53 || 61 || 2 || 55 || 21 || 1 ||
 * 3 || Hispanic ﻿ || 17690 || 3655 || 21 || 5010 || 28 || 8677 || 49 || 288 || 2 || 51 || 60 || 0 ||
 * 3 || White (not Hispanic) || 36612 || 2269 || 6 || 4838 || 13 || 26248 || 72 || 3145 || 9 || 80 || 112 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Data invalid or not provided || 2 || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * PRIMARY DISABILITY ||
 * 3 || None || 55664 || 4474 || 8 || 9889 || 18 || 37441 || 67 || 3711 || 7 || 74 || 149 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Limited intellectual capacity || 35 || 28 || 80 || 2 || 6 || 4 || 11 || 0 || 0 || 11 || 1 || 3 ||


 * Grade || Category || Total || # Unsat || % Unsat || # Part Prof || % Part Prof |||| # Prof || % Prof || # Adv || % Adv || % Prof & Adv || # No Scr || % No Scr ||
 * 3 || Emotional disability || 341 || 123 || 36 || 75 || 22 |||| 130 || 38 || 2 || 1 || 39 || 11 || 3 ||
 * 3 || Specific learning disability || 2268 || 1365 || 60 || 541 || 24 |||| 339 || 15 || 5 || 0 || 15 || 18 || 1 ||
 * 3 || Hearing disability || 112 || 46 || 41 || 37 || 33 |||| 28 || 25 || 1 || 1 || 26 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Visual disability || 22 || 5 || 23 || 5 || 23 |||| 9 || 41 || 3 || 14 || 55 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Physical disability || 577 || 213 || 37 || 163 || 28 |||| 180 || 31 || 8 || 1 || 33 || 13 || 2 ||
 * 3 || Speech/language disability || 1882 || 633 || 34 || 520 || 28 |||| 691 || 37 || 30 || 2 || 38 || 8 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Deaf-blind || 0 || X || X || X || X |||| X || X || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || Multiple disabilities || 10 || X || X || X || X |||| X || X || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || Autism || 165 || 35 || 21 || 48 || 29 |||| 71 || 43 || 2 || 1 || 44 || 9 || 5 ||
 * 3 || Traumatic brain injury || 17 || 12 || 71 || 3 || 18 |||| 2 || 12 || 0 || 0 || 12 || 0 || 0 ||


 * 3 || IEP || 5428 || 2464 || 45 || 1396 || 26 |||| 1457 || 27 || 50 || 1 || 28 || 61 || 1 ||
 * 3 || 504 Plan || 230 || 11 || 5 || 38 || 17 |||| 160 || 70 || 17 || 7 || 77 || 4 || 2 ||
 * 3 || T itle 1 || 20505 || 4124 || 20 || 5581 || 27 |||| 10318 || 50 || 407 || 2 || 52 || 75 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Migrant || 258 || 78 || 30 || 94 || 36 |||| 86 || 33 || 0 || 0 || 33 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Immigrant || 773 || 235 || 30 || 184 || 24 |||| 317 || 41 || 18 || 2 || 43 || 19 || 2 ||
 * 3 || Oct New to School || 2781 || 560 || 20 || 704 || 25 |||| 1401 || 50 || 76 || 3 || 53 || 40 || 1 ||
 * 3 || Homeless || 931 || 222 || 24 || 259 || 28 |||| 433 || 47 || 13 || 1 || 48 || 4 || 0 ||
 * LANGUAGE BACKGROUND ||
 * 3 || English || 50073 || 4153 || 8 || 7886 || 16 |||| 34256 || 68 || 3627 || 7 || 76 || 151 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Spanish || 9089 || 2483 || 27 || 2969 || 33 |||| 3555 || 39 || 47 || 1 || 40 || 35 || 0 ||
 * 3 || Other || 1931 || 303 || 16 || 429 || 22 |||| 1087 || 56 || 88 || 5 || 61 || 24 || 1 ||
 * ENGLISH PROFICIENCY ||
 * 3 || Not applicable || 50070 || 4154 || 8 || 7886 || 16 |||| 34253 || 68 || 3626 || 7 || 76 || 151 || 0 ||
 * 3 || NE P || 2278 || 1534 || 67 || 513 || 23 |||| 189 || 8 || 1 || 0 || 8 || 41 || 2 ||
 * 3 || LEP || 7358 || 1224 || 17 || 2767 || 38 |||| 3315 || 45 || 36 || 0 || 46 || 16 || 0 ||
 * 3 || FEP || 1385 || 27 || 2 || 118 || 9 |||| 1140 || 82 || 98 || 7 || 89 || 2 || 0 ||
 * ELL PROGRAM - BILINGUAL ||
 * 3 || Ye s || 532 || 172 || 32 || 177 || 33 |||| 179 || 34 || 4 || 1 || 34 || 0 || 0 ||

Performance of Schools Classified by Socioeconomic Status
This section presents summaries of the performance of students in schools of differing socioeconomic status (SES). Percent of students receiving free or reduced-cost lunch is used as the indicator for school SES. Four levels of SES characterize schools: Level 1: 0-25% receiving free or reduced-cost lunch Level 2: 26-50% receiving free or reduced-cost lunch Level 3: 51-75% receiving free or reduced-cost lunch Level 4: 76-100% receiving free or reduced-cost lunch

Math Total ||
 * SES Level || % Unsatisfactory || % Partially Proficient || %Proficient || %Advanced || % Not Tested || %
 * Level 1 (0-25%) || 3 || 12 || 36 || 48 || 1 || 100 ||
 * Level 2 (26-50%) || 6 || 20 || 40 || 33 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 3 (51-75%) || 9 || 25 || 41 || 25 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 4 (76-100%) || 17 || 34 || 36 || 13 || 0 || 100 ||

Writing Total ||
 * SES Level || % Unsatisfactory || % Partially Proficient || %Proficient || %Advanced || % Not Tested || %
 * Level 1 (0-25%) || 2 || 31 || 52 || 13 || 1 || 100 ||
 * Level 2 (26-50%) || 5 || 42 || 43 || 9 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 3 (51-75%) || 8 || 48 || 38 || 5 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 4 (76-100%) || 14 || 57 || 26 || 2 || 0 || 100 ||

Reading Total ||
 * SES Level || % Unsatisfactory || % Partially Proficient || %Proficient || %Advanced || % Not Tested || %
 * Level 1 (0-25%) || 4 || 11 || 74 || 10 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 2 (26-50%) || 9 || 17 || 67 || 6 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 3 (51-75%) || 14 || 23 || 60 || 3 || 0 || 100 ||
 * Level 4 (76-100%) || 24 || 29 || 45 || 1 || 0 || 100 ||

Performance of Schools by Districts
2010 Grade 3 Math Results by District ||
 * Table 17A(2) Mathematics Performance of Grade 3 Students in Colorado School Districts
 * Grade || District || % Unsat || % Part Prof || % Prof || % Adv || % No Scr ||
 * 3 || ACADEMY 20 || 2 || 13 || 37 || 47 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR || 7 || 19 || 34 || 32 || 7 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS ARAPAHOE 28J || 20 || 34 || 33 || 12 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS COUNTY 14 || 14 || 39 || 40 || 7 || 0 ||
 * 3 || AGATE 300 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || AGUILAR REORGANIZED 6 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || AKRON R 1 || 6 || 28 || 31 || 34 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ALAMOSA RE 11J || 9 || 28 || 39 || 25 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ARCHULETA COUNTY 50 JT || 4 || 24 || 44 || 29 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ARICKAREE R 2 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || ARRIBA FLAGLER C 20 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || ASPEN 1 || 1 || 10 || 48 || 40 || 2 ||
 * 3 || AULT HIGHLAND RE 9 || 14 || 20 || 42 || 22 || 1 ||
 * 3 || BAYFIELD 10 JT R || 2 || 22 || 46 || 30 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BENNETT 29J || 13 || 22 || 40 || 24 || 1 ||
 * 3 || BETHUNE R 5 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || BIG SANDY 100J || 5 || 18 || 55 || 23 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BOULDER VALLEY RE 2 || 4 || 15 || 33 || 48 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BRANSON REORGANIZED 82 || 0 || 24 || 53 || 24 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BRIGGSDALE RE 10 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || BRIGHTON 27J || 6 || 24 || 43 || 26 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BRUSH RE 2J || 11 || 26 || 37 || 27 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BUENA VISTA R 31 || 3 || 16 || 34 || 47 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BUFFALO RE 4 || 0 || 22 || 35 || 43 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BURLINGTON RE 6J || 3 || 28 || 35 || 33 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BYERS 32J || 3 || 24 || 37 || 37 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CALHAN RJ 1 || 2 || 22 || 40 || 36 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CAMPO RE 6 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CANON CITY RE 1 || 7 || 21 || 46 || 27 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CENTENNIAL R 1 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CENTER 26 JT || 23 || 46 || 31 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE || 5 || 23 || 47 || 26 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHERAW 31 || 0 || 6 || 65 || 29 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHERRY CREEK 5 || 5 || 16 || 34 || 44 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHEYENNE COUNTY RE 5 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 12 || 2 || 7 || 34 || 57 || 0 ||

2010 Grade 3 Writing Results by District ||
 * Table 9A(2) Writing Performance of Grade 3 Students in Colorado School Districts
 * Grade || District || % Unsat || % Part Prof || % Prof || % Adv || % No Scr ||
 * 3 || ACADEMY 20 || 3 || 31 || 52 || 14 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR || 8 || 45 || 34 || 6 || 7 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS ARAPAHOE 28J || 17 || 54 || 26 || 3 || 1 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS COUNTY 14 || 9 || 60 || 30 || 1 || 0 ||
 * 3 || AGATE 300 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || AGUILAR REORGANIZED 6 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || AKRON R 1 || 6 || 53 || 28 || 13 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ALAMOSA RE 11J || 7 || 55 || 33 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ARCHULETA COUNTY 50 JT || 3 || 39 || 54 || 4 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ARICKAREE R 2 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || ARRIBA FLAGLER C 20 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || ASPEN 1 || 1 || 36 || 53 || 9 || 2 ||
 * 3 || AULT HIGHLAND RE 9 || 10 || 55 || 32 || 1 || 1 ||
 * 3 || BAYFIELD 10 JT R || 2 || 43 || 51 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BENNETT 29J || 3 || 46 || 44 || 7 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BETHUNE R 5 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || BIG SANDY 100J || 0 || 32 || 68 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BOULDER VALLEY RE 2 || 3 || 33 || 50 || 13 || 1 ||
 * 3 || BRANSON REORGANIZED 82 || 0 || 35 || 59 || 6 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BRIGGSDALE RE 10 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || BRIGHTON 27J || 6 || 43 || 43 || 7 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BRUSH RE 2J || 7 || 51 || 39 || 3 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BUENA VISTA R 31 || 2 || 43 || 50 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BUFFALO RE 4 || 0 || 43 || 48 || 9 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BURLINGTON RE 6J || 2 || 43 || 50 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BYERS 32J || 0 || 37 || 55 || 8 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CALHAN RJ 1 || 4 || 36 || 60 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CAMPO RE 6 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CANON CITY RE 1 || 4 || 52 || 37 || 5 || 2 ||
 * 3 || CENTENNIAL R 1 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CENTER 26 JT || 20 || 66 || 14 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE || 4 || 47 || 44 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHERAW 31 || 0 || 35 || 59 || 6 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHERRY CREEK 5 || 5 || 35 || 48 || 11 || 1 ||
 * 3 || CHEYENNE COUNTY RE 5 || X || X || X || X || X ||



Table 1A(2) Reading Comprehension Performance of Grade 3 Students in Colorado School Districts 2010 Grade 3 Reading Results by District ||
 * Grade || District || % Unsat || % Part Prof || % Prof || % Adv || % No Scr ||
 * 3 || ACADEMY 20 || 4 || 10 || 76 || 10 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR || 15 || 20 || 60 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS ARAPAHOE 28J || 27 || 26 || 44 || 2 || 1 ||
 * 3 || ADAMS COUNTY 14 || 21 || 33 || 45 || 1 || 0 ||
 * 3 || AGATE 300 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || AGUILAR REORGANIZED 6 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || AKRON R 1 || 9 || 16 || 59 || 13 || 3 ||
 * 3 || ALAMOSA RE 11J || 11 || 24 || 62 || 3 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ARCHULETA COUNTY 50 JT || 8 || 23 || 64 || 6 || 0 ||
 * 3 || ARICKAREE R 2 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || ARRIBA FLAGLER C 20 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || ASPEN 1 || 0 || 8 || 82 || 9 || 2 ||
 * 3 || AULT HIGHLAND RE 9 || 15 || 29 || 56 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BAYFIELD 10 JT R || 5 || 16 || 73 || 4 || 2 ||
 * 3 || BENNETT 29J || 7 || 26 || 64 || 3 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BETHUNE R 5 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || BIG SANDY 100J || 9 || 18 || 73 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BOULDER VALLEY RE 2 || 6 || 11 || 67 || 16 || 1 ||
 * 3 || BRANSON REORGANIZED 82 || 6 || 22 || 67 || 6 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BRIGGSDALE RE 10 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || BRIGHTON 27J || 9 || 20 || 66 || 6 || 1 ||
 * 3 || BRUSH RE 2J || 16 || 27 || 52 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BUENA VISTA R 31 || 9 || 19 || 62 || 9 || 2 ||
 * 3 || BUFFALO RE 4 || 5 || 9 || 86 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BURLINGTON RE 6J || 5 || 13 || 77 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || BYERS 32J || 0 || 18 || 71 || 11 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CALHAN RJ 1 || 7 || 17 || 70 || 7 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CAMPO RE 6 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CANON CITY RE 1 || 7 || 19 || 70 || 3 || 1 ||
 * 3 || CENTENNIAL R 1 || X || X || X || X || X ||
 * 3 || CENTER 26 JT || 28 || 44 || 28 || 0 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHARTER SCHOOL INSTITUTE || 8 || 18 || 70 || 5 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHERAW 31 || 0 || 18 || 76 || 6 || 0 ||
 * 3 || CHERRY CREEK 5 || 8 || 14 || 69 || 8 || 1 ||
 * 3 || CHEYENNE COUNTY RE 5 || X || X || X || X || X ||